The Drama Between Taylor Swift and Big Machine Records: What You Need to Know About Scooter Braun and Scott Borchetta

Taylor Swift’s tumultuous relationship with Big Machine Records and its executives, Scott Borchetta and Scooter Braun, has reached a pivotal conclusion after years of conflict. The saga began when Swift transitioned to Republic Records in November 2018, a decision marked by significant tension. The following year, Braun’s acquisition of Big Machine included Swift’s master recordings in a deal that was estimated at around $300 million. Swift publicly expressed her dismay on Tumblr, stating that she felt compelled to leave her past behind, as she learned about the sale of her masters like everyone else. She accused Braun of enduring years of “incessant, manipulative bullying” from his high-profile clients, notably Justin Bieber and Kanye West. This revelation drew considerable attention and polarized opinions within the music industry.

In her Tumblr post, Swift characterized Braun’s acquisition of her catalog as her “worst case scenario,” highlighting her personal and artistic struggles in the face of corporate decision-making. The fallout was immediate, with Borchetta and Braun’s then-wife, Yael Cohen, stepping forward to counter Swift’s claims. This reaction did little to temper the public and industry backlash, as several prominent artists including Halsey, Kelly Clarkson, and Ed Sheeran openly sided with Swift, validating her feelings and experiences.

The situation escalated again in November 2020 when Braun sold Swift’s masters to Shamrock Holdings, a private equity firm, in what Swift described as another instance of being undermined. While it was reported that Braun offered her the chance to buy her masters before the sale, the fact that the deal went through without her knowledge fueled her grievance further. This pattern of actions highlighted the complexities of artists’ rights within the music industry, especially concerning the ownership of creative work, which has historically been a contentious issue.

Swift’s frustration was not solely rooted in financial implications but also in the emotional toll of losing control over her artistic legacy. Her outspoken stance against Braun resonated with many fans and peers who felt similarly disempowered in the face of industry giants. Swift expanded the conversation about artist rights beyond her own experiences, advocating for more equitable treatment of musicians within the music business.

By May 2025, Swift announced a significant milestone: she officially regained ownership of all her earlier music. This achievement marked not only a personal win for her but also served as a broader commentary on the evolving landscape of artist rights and the ongoing struggle for ownership amidst powerful corporate interests. Swift’s efforts were seen as a rallying cry for other artists, encouraging them to fight for their rights and highlighting the importance of self-determination in creative fields.

In summary, Taylor Swift’s protracted battle with Scott Borchetta and Scooter Braun serves as a case study in the complexities of artist rights in the music industry. Her journey reflects the ongoing challenges artists face in preserving their creative integrity against corporate maneuvers, and her eventual success in regaining ownership of her music signals a pivotal shift that may inspire future generations of musicians. As the industry continues to evolve, Swift’s narrative emphasizes the significance of transparency, empowerment, and the relentless pursuit of creative sovereignty.