Mahmoud Khalil, a former student at Columbia University and an activist, criticized the institution for its perceived hypocrisy regarding the treatment of international students. He addressed supporters on the steps of St. John the Divine in New York, expressing frustration over the university’s lack of communication during his 104-day detention by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Khalil highlighted the incongruity between Columbia’s public statements in support of international students and their failure to assist him, saying, “I haven’t received a single call from this university” despite their recent declarations of support.
Khalil’s journey took a troubling turn when he was arrested on March 8 and subsequently placed in a detention center in Louisiana. The Trump administration sought to deport the Syrian-born permanent resident, arguing that he posed a threat to U.S. foreign policy. He maintained that Columbia’s inaction allowed hostile groups to target him and other students, illustrating a lack of protection from anti-Palestinian sentiment on campus. His comments reflected a broader concern about how universities navigate complex political landscapes and support marginalized groups.
Despite having garnered significant support during his detention—friends and family rallied outside the detention center—Khalil and his supporters faced disappointment as Columbia chose not to facilitate a homecoming event on campus. In statements captured shortly after his release, he reiterated that the struggles were not over, framing his return as a bittersweet moment rather than a complete victory. This sentiment illustrated the continuing challenges faced by advocates for Palestinian rights within academic spaces.
Khalil’s release came following a ruling by a judge in New Jersey, who deemed his detention likely unconstitutional. However, the threat of deportation still loomed over him, as the Trump administration moved to appeal the judge’s decision. Khalil’s situation underscored pressing questions about immigrant rights and the treatment of individuals connected to politically charged movements, particularly those involving Palestine.
As he celebrated his homecoming, surrounded by supporters waving flags and bearing signs, Khalil resonated with the shared discontent toward institutional responses to political dissent, specifically regarding their inadequacy in protecting students involved in activism. The collective spirit among attendees suggested a commitment to continued advocacy, emphasizing the need for solidarity in the face of systemic challenges.
In conclusion, Khalil’s experience serves as a poignant reminder of the complexities surrounding immigration, activism, and institutional support within higher education. As he continues to fight against the deportation order, his case highlights the ongoing struggles faced by marginalized individuals in navigating legal and institutional barriers, raising awareness about the need for strong allyship and advocacy for those targeted by governmental policies.
