Proponents of a ballot measure in Washington state rejoiced after what appeared to be a narrow victory in favor of protecting access to natural gas. The count showed just under 1.8 million “yea” votes and 1.68 million “nay” votes. The measure would prevent state regulators from approving plans that encourage Washingtonians to end their natural gas service and require utilities to supply the energy source to those who request it. Supporters argued that access to natural gas enhances safety, welfare, and the standard of living for all residents and promotes energy choice, security, independence, and resilience in the state. They also pointed out the importance of natural gas as a backup energy source during emergencies and for heating, cooking, and other household activities. The measure also aimed to prevent future natural gas bans in Washington state.
The ballot measure was seen as a response to legislation signed by outgoing Democratic Gov. Jay Inslee earlier in the year that would move utilities away from natural gas. Proponents criticized Inslee and Gov.-elect Bob Ferguson for their opposition to the measure, with one advocate calling Inslee a “pompous turd” on the radio. Inslee had suggested that the measure could face legal challenges if passed, claiming that its description was inadequate. The measure’s passage was a surprising move in a blue state like Washington, which has generally supported more stringent regulations on energy sources. The Biden administration had previously considered banning natural gas-powered stoves before facing backlash and reconsidering.
Experts criticized the Biden administration for its approach to natural gas regulations. Internal memos revealed that the administration had seriously considered banning gas stoves before backing off due to widespread criticism. The memorandum suggested that there was evidence to support a rulemaking process to ban gas stoves, but the idea was ultimately rejected. The passage of the ballot measure in Washington state contradicted the federal administration’s stance on natural gas regulation, signaling a shift in policy at the state level. The measure aimed to protect access to natural gas for residents and prevent future bans, arguing that natural gas is essential for safety, convenience, and cost control.
The measure’s proponents emphasized the importance of natural gas for households, businesses, and emergency situations. They argued that access to natural gas is crucial for maintaining a high standard of living, promoting energy independence, and ensuring resilience in the state. By passing the ballot measure, Washington voters supported the protection of natural gas infrastructure and systems, preventing regulators from incentivizing residents to end their natural gas service. The measure aimed to give consumers more choices and control over their energy sources, countering policies that limited these options in the past. The victory for the measure in Washington state was seen as a win for those who value access to natural gas and energy choice.
