Kelowna city councillor Ron Cannan accused Mayor Tom Dyas of bullying at a recent council meeting. Cannan felt that Dyas was trying to silence him by telling him that he did not understand the policy related to procurement and prioritizing Canadian products and services. The policy in question was brought forward by Cannan in a notice of motion last month to review and prioritize buying local. Despite canceling an interview with Global News on the topic after Dyas told him to “stand down on engaging with the media,” Cannan expressed his concerns during the council meeting about feeling shut down by the mayor.
Both Cannan and Dyas did not make themselves available for post-council meeting interviews, but Dyas maintained that he is not silencing councillors. He emphasized that councillors are free to share their opinions with the media as they are elected representatives. However, Dyas also pointed out that, as per the city’s code of conduct, he is the primary spokesperson on city matters. He expressed concerns about inappropriate or unnecessary comments made by councillors that could distract from the city’s work and reputation. Dyas cited an example of a recent statement made by Coun. Mohini Singh that was not properly researched or accurate.
Kelowna residents had mixed feelings about whether the mayor should instruct councillors to avoid speaking to the media before council debates on issues. Some residents felt that councillors should not be muzzled and should have the freedom to speak to the media. Others were more inclined to agree with the mayor’s position, finding merit in discussing important matters first at the council table. Dyas defended his directive as being in the best interest of the city, aimed at protecting the integrity of decisions, respecting staff, maintaining public trust, and upholding the community’s values. By ensuring that proper processes are followed, Dyas believed confidence in the council’s work can be strengthened under the community charter.
The issue between Cannan and Dyas raised questions about how elected officials communicate and engage with the media in Kelowna. While Dyas maintained that he was not trying to silence councillors, Cannan felt that he was being bullied and shut down by the mayor. This incident highlighted a disagreement in approach and communication styles within the city council, with concerns raised about how comments made by councillors could impact the city’s reputation. The debate also brought attention to the balance between transparency and proper process in decision-making, with residents and officials weighing in on the best way to navigate these challenges.
Overall, the interactions between Cannan and Dyas shed light on the complexities of governance and communication within a municipal setting. The differing perspectives on when and how councillors should engage with the media reflect broader tensions around accountability, transparency, and effective decision-making in local government. As Kelowna continues to navigate these issues, it remains important for elected officials to find a balance between expressing their views and opinions while upholding the principles of good governance and ensuring the public’s trust in their work. By addressing concerns openly and transparently, the city council can work towards building a stronger and more resilient community for all residents.
