Martha McHardy is a U.S. News reporter stationed in London, concentrating on polling and California politics. Her extensive coverage includes the upcoming 2024 election and pro-Palestine protests at U.S. colleges. With a background in journalism from Durham University and a professional qualification from News Associates, Martha joined Newsweek in 2024 after her tenure at The Independent. Her prior experience includes freelance work for various news outlets, demonstrating her versatility and expertise in the field. You can reach Martha at her Newsweek email address, m.mchardy@newsweek.com.
Shane Croucher serves as a Breaking News Editor in London and has transitioned through various editorial roles at Newsweek since 2018. His extensive background in journalism encompasses overseeing teams covering U.S. news and politics, resulting in a deep understanding of these subjects. Croucher’s previous roles at IBT UK showcased his broad reporting experience in areas such as economics, business, and property. He is a graduate of the University of Lincoln and can be contacted at s.croucher@newsweek.com.
In a noteworthy legal development, former President Donald Trump celebrated a significant ruling by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, affirming his authority to deploy California’s National Guard against the backdrop of unrest in Los Angeles. This ruling overturned a previous lower court’s decision that deemed Trump’s actions illegal, especially given the opposition from California Governor Gavin Newsom. Trump’s announcement on his Truth Social platform underscored his belief in the necessity of federal intervention when state and local authorities are unable to manage disorder.
The ruling marks a historical precedent, as this is the first instance of a president deploying a state National Guard unit without gubernatorial consent since 1965. The three-judge panel’s unanimous decision highlighted that while presidential authority is not absolute in this context, the Trump administration had substantiated its rationale for federal involvement. The court acknowledged the increasing instances of violence linked to protests as a legitimate basis for federal action, provoking discussion on the balance of power between state and federal jurisdictions.
The decision aligns with Trump’s broader narrative of defending law-abiding citizens, framing the legality of his actions as essential for national security. His remarks celebrated the court’s ruling as a victory not just for California, but as a reinforcement of the presidential power to safeguard American cities when local authorities fall short. This legal victory amplifies ongoing debates surrounding executive power and the implications of federal intervention in state matters, particularly in crises marked by civil disorder.
As developments in this story continue to unfold, the implications of this ruling are likely to resonate far beyond California. The decision raises critical questions about the dynamics between state governors and federal authority, potentially setting a precedent for future administrations. Both McHardy and Croucher are poised to provide ongoing coverage and analysis, ensuring that readers stay informed on this unfolding judicial landscape and its ramifications in American politics.
