In a recent public inquiry, John Ajaka, the ousted chief executive of Liverpool Council, has vehemently denied allegations that he failed to address false rumors regarding a potential layoff of 150 council employees. This misinformation incited significant protests, primarily led by union members concerned about job security. The tensions escalated to a point where confrontational chants, including “Put some pork on your fork,” were directed at Mayor Ned Mannoun, a Muslim figure, as demonstrators sought to voice their discontent. The situation reached a boiling point during a chaotic council meeting on April 24, where police were called to manage the unrest after Ajaka was suspended pending an investigation linked to his conduct during a recent meeting.
The inquiry has delved into the complexities of Ajaka’s tenure at Liverpool Council, highlighting the disintegration of his working relationship with Mayor Mannoun. Notably, on April 16, Ajaka reportedly exchanged heated words with Mannoun, instructing him to “shut the f— up” during a crucial discussion surrounding staff employment matters. Ajaka’s position at the council, which he assumed in late 2022, became increasingly precarious as tensions mounted between him and the mayor. The inquiry has revealed this friction, suggesting that Ajaka’s concerns for his job may have influenced his response to the circulating rumors impacting staff employment.
Evidence presented during the inquiry indicated that Ajaka was made aware of an email propagating the erroneous rumors on the eve of a significant radio broadcast. On that occasion, United Services Union advocate Steve Donley informed listeners of 2GB Radio about the looming threat to jobs and the impending protest that was set to occur outside the council meeting. Donley’s statements hinted at an internal power struggle, claiming that Ajaka had been told about a closed session where Mannoun would decide on his dismissal, thus adding to the tumultuous atmosphere surrounding the council.
Ajaka testified that numerous individuals had reached out to him regarding the statements made during the radio segment, underscoring the rapid dissemination of the rumor. Although he was familiar with Donley and had some understanding of the brewing situation, Ajaka stated he did not expect the demonstration to turn volatile. His testimony pointed to a possible disconnect between his perception of the protests and the reality on the ground as emotions ran high among union members, who were passionately defending their positions and livelihoods.
The inquiry has anticipated further exploration of the dynamics at play within Liverpool Council, especially concerning the alleged dysfunction and maladministration reported under Ajaka’s leadership. The public interest in the proceedings has been notable; both Ajaka and Mannoun have become focal points within a broader narrative about governance and accountability in local councils. As the inquiry progresses, the implications of their fraught relationship may provide deeper insights into the operational challenges and miscommunications that have contributed to the current crisis.
Overall, Ajaka’s denial of wrongdoing in the context of the rumors reflects the broader complexities of navigating leadership roles amid organizational strife. The inquiry seeks to untangle the layers of decision-making and conflict that have characterized Liverpool Council’s recent past. As details continue to unfold, they may reshape public perceptions of both Ajaka and Mannoun, as well as the institution itself, potentially leading to significant ramifications for its future operations and commitment to staff welfare.
