A former U.S. Coast Guard lieutenant, Peter Stinson, has been arrested for allegedly threatening to kill President Donald Trump, as detailed in recently uncovered court documents. Stinson served in the Coast Guard from 1988 to 2021 and has background experience as a sharpshooter and FEMA instructor. The FBI’s task force provided an affidavit outlining various online threatsStinson purportedly made against Trump. One particularly alarming post from May 9 referred to the president’s need to be “[L]uigied,” drawing a disturbing connection to a murder case involving Luigi Mangione.
Multiple graphic threats reportedly crafted by Stinson were found across various social media platforms. These threats allegedly included methods involving firearms, poisoning, and knives. Disturbingly, Stinson indicated on several occasions that he lacked the skills necessary to carry out an assassination but hinted at a potentially deceptive self-assessment. His language painted a worrying picture of someone who might be contemplating serious violence.
Additionally, the affidavit pointed out that Stinson frequently referenced the number “8647,” which appears to allude to a controversial Instagram post by former FBI Director James Comey. This post was interpreted by some media as a violent threat against Trump, leading to investigations by various government agencies, including the Department of Homeland Security and the Secret Service. Stinson’s repeated mentions of “8647” across 13 separate posts on Bluesky raised red flags for law enforcement.
Stinson also self-identified with ANTIFA, a far-left activist group, which could add a political dimension to his alleged threats. In a post from February 2, he described the current climate as a “war,” stating that “sides will be drawn” and that “Antifa always wins in the end,” suggesting a violent ideological commitment. This rhetoric, coupled with the threats against the president, raises concerns not just about Stinson’s mental state but also about the potential implications for broader societal safety.
The latest post cited in the affidavit was published on June 11, wherein Stinson ominously stated that “when he dies, the party is going to be yuge.” Such statements seem to underscore a fixation on the president’s demise and its perceived impact on political dynamics. Following these developments, Stinson has been charged with making threats against the president and is expected to appear in federal court for an initial hearing.
The case against Stinson serves as a stark reminder of the volatility surrounding political discourse in the United States. Disturbing threats such as those allegedly made by Stinson highlight the ever-present risks associated with extremist ideologies and the potential for real-world violence emanating from radicalized individuals. As investigations continue, the focus will likely remain on both Stinson and the broader implications of violent rhetoric within the current political landscape.
