Hunter Biden was successful in getting his lawsuit against former White House aide Garrett Ziegler dropped due to financial difficulties, but the judge ruled that he cannot bring the case again in the future. The California federal Judge Hernán Vera granted Biden’s request to dismiss the case, after Biden cited his inability to pay off his debts as a result of struggles in selling his memoir and art, and the forced relocation of his family from their rental home in Malibu after wildfires hit the area.
In a report by The Post, it was revealed that Hunter Biden’s home looked undamaged by the fires that destroyed surrounding houses in the Pacific Palisade area in January. The extent of any unseen damage inside the house was unclear. Ziegler, who had served as an aide to trade adviser Peter Navarro during the Trump administration, tried to prevent the case against him from being dropped in order to pursue legal fees from Biden.
Although Judge Vera agreed to close the case, he denied Hunter’s request to potentially file the case again in the future. Hunter was expected to be deposed on March 10 by Ziegler, who he accused of hacking his laptop and sharing its embarrassing contents on a conservative non-profit website called Marco Polo. Lawyers for both Hunter and Ziegler did not immediately respond to requests for comments.
The ruling in this case signifies the end of Hunter Biden’s attempt to hold Ziegler accountable for his actions regarding the alleged hacking of his laptop. The decision to dismiss the case due to Biden’s financial struggles highlights the impact of his lack of income from his artistic endeavors and book sales, as well as the challenges faced by his family after being displaced by the wildfires in Malibu. The judge’s refusal to leave the case open-ended prevents Hunter from seeking legal recourse against Ziegler in the future.
The exclusive photos published by The Post revealing the condition of Hunter Biden’s home in the aftermath of the wildfires provided a glimpse into the personal challenges faced by the Biden family. Despite the external appearance of the house remaining unscathed, the potential for unseen damage underscores the uncertainty surrounding their living situation. Ziegler’s attempt to contest the dismissal of the case in order to recover legal fees from Biden adds a legal dimension to the ongoing dispute between the two parties.
Overall, the ruling in Hunter Biden’s lawsuit against Garrett Ziegler sheds light on the financial difficulties faced by Biden and his family, as well as the legal battles stemming from the alleged hacking of his laptop. The decision to drop the case marks a conclusion to this particular chapter, while also raising questions about the implications for future legal actions. Despite the dismissal of the lawsuit, the underlying issues surrounding the alleged hacking incident and its aftermath remain unresolved, leaving both parties to navigate the aftermath of this legal dispute.
