The author of the article, an experienced professional who has worked with senior leaders from various administrations, offers recommendations to the new administration’s national security team. The team includes Vice President JD Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, Tulsi Gabbard – director of the Office of National Intelligence, and Michael Waltz – national security adviser, in the aftermath of a security breach known as Signalgate. The author emphasizes the importance of trusting and relying on the expertise of the military and civilian professionals assigned to them, warning against disregarding their knowledge and experience.
Furthermore, the author underscores the significance of maintaining the dignity and professionalism of their office, reminding them that their actions are subject to constant scrutiny by the American people, the media, and the world at large. Emphasizing the seriousness of their roles and responsibilities, the author advises against unprofessional conduct such as using emojis in communication, using insecure platforms like Signal for sensitive matters, or making derogatory remarks towards others.
The author recommends trusting and utilizing the extensive and secure communication systems available to the national security team, such as the National Military Command Center and other communication channels within the Pentagon. By acknowledging and owning their mistakes, the author suggests that transparency and accountability are essential qualities for effective leadership. Denying wrongdoing or attempting to cover up mistakes will not be well-received by the people they lead, including members of the military, intelligence community, and diplomatic services.
Moreover, the author questions why senior military personnel were excluded from the discussion, highlighting the importance of including relevant military leaders in high-level national security meetings to ensure communication is done through approved channels and at the appropriate security level. Additionally, the author reminds the team that they are always targets for espionage and should remain vigilant against potential threats and attempts to infiltrate their communications.
Finally, the author cautions against embarrassing the president or the country and advises the team to conduct themselves with caution and professionalism to avoid negative consequences. The author suggests that if the team members feel their experiences and capabilities are not up to the job, they have a duty to acknowledge this and consider stepping aside for the good of the American people and the administration. Overall, the recommendations aim to guide the national security team towards effective and responsible leadership in their roles.
