New York City, often hailed as “The Big Apple,” boasts an expansive public transportation system, stunning parks, and a plethora of landmarks within walking distance. Despite these features, a recent USA Today article deemed it the tenth most walkable city in the U.S. for 2025, far behind Philadelphia, which topped the list for the third consecutive year. The surprising ranks provoked widespread debate about what truly defines a walkable city and raised questions about the criteria used by travel experts.
Philadelphia’s success as the most walkable city stems from its densely gridded Center City, which offers an array of charming neighborhoods such as the historic Old City and Rittenhouse Square. Many believe that its smaller scale and concentrated points of interest make it easier for residents and tourists alike to navigate on foot. In contrast, New York City, despite offering walkable areas across its five boroughs, suffers from its vast size, which may have overshadowed the accessibility of its attractions. The lists also featured less expected contenders like Providence, RI, and Burlington, VT, which raised eyebrows and fuelled discussions on urban design.
Interestingly, the debate around walkability is accentuated by current trends, such as rising gas prices and public transportation costs, which push more people to seek pedestrian-friendly options. This has become a critical topic across communities in the U.S. Different perspectives on walkability emerged in discussions among residents on social platforms like Reddit, where former New Yorkers have voiced that walking in Philadelphia feels more enjoyable due to its narrower and more manageable streets. However, they also acknowledged limitations in business accessibility in many neighborhoods outside the Center City peninsula.
Contrasting opinions highlight the complexity of walkability, suggesting that while cities like Philadelphia make strides with compact neighborhoods, they may lack essential services in a broader context. This has led some to question whether the size of a city should impact its walkability ranking. Additionally, some commenters cynically suggested that the rankings might overlook significant aspects of urban infrastructure and the inherent differences in lifestyle that various cities foster.
Despite the rankings’ implications, New Yorkers have reasons to maintain their pride. The city’s extensive transit system allows millions to walk to subway stops, significantly contributing to pedestrian traffic. Even if New York trails behind in walkability assessments, it remains unparalleled as a global hub where walking complements a vibrant lifestyle marked by cultural richness and diversity.
Ultimately, the discourse surrounding walkability is evolving, with New York City’s reputation being challenged while simultaneously sparking deep reflections on urban design and livability. As cities continue to adapt to changing societal norms and expectations, the criteria for walkability will likely remain a focal conversation that underscores the balance between embracing both size and accessibility in urban planning.
